Legal Terms

Cross-claim meaning in law and legal documents

A cross-claim is a claim brought against a co-defendant or co-plaintiff within the same proceeding.

Normal people might use the phrase "suing someone back" instead of "cross-claim"

Need help making sense of complex legalese?

Detangle your own document →

What does cross-claim mean in legal documents?

A cross-claim is a legal pleading filed by a defendant in a lawsuit against another defendant or by a plaintiff against another plaintiff within the same legal action. This type of claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the original action or of a counterclaim therein. Essentially, it's a claim brought against a party who is already on the same side of the lawsuit, either as a co-defendant or co-plaintiff.

The strategic purpose of a cross-claim is to address related disputes that involve co-parties in the case, allowing the court to resolve all interrelated issues in one comprehensive proceeding. This promotes judicial efficiency by avoiding multiple lawsuits over the same set of facts. For example, in a car accident involving multiple vehicles, one driver might file a cross-claim against another driver for contributing to the accident, even though both are defendants in the initial lawsuit brought by an injured party.

In terms of procedure, the party filing a cross-claim must serve the cross-claim on all parties to the action, including the party against whom the cross-claim is made. The served party then has the opportunity to respond to the cross-claim, just as they would to the original complaint. If they fail to respond, they risk a default judgment in favor of the party who filed the cross-claim.

It's important to note that cross-claims are distinct from counterclaims, which are claims made against an opposing party. A counterclaim is typically filed by a defendant against the plaintiff, while a cross-claim is between parties on the same side of the original case. Understanding this difference is critical when determining how to properly address issues that may arise among parties on the same side of a lawsuit.

Lastly, the jurisdictional requirements for a cross-claim can be less stringent than for an original claim. In federal court, for example, cross-claims can often be heard under supplemental jurisdiction even if they do not meet the amount-in-controversy requirement or have independent diversity jurisdiction, so long as they are part of the same case or controversy as the original action. This allows federal courts to hear all claims related to a legal dispute in a single action, streamlining the process for the court and the parties involved.

What are some examples of cross-claim in legal contracts?

Need help making sense of complex legalese?

Detangle your own document →