Legal Terms

Precedent meaning in law and legal documents

A precedent is a legal decision or form of guidance that influences subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.

Normal people might use the phrase "past decision" instead of "precedent"

Need help making sense of complex legalese?

Detangle your own document →

What does precedent mean in legal documents?

The concept of precedent plays a crucial role in the legal system, particularly in common law jurisdictions. At its core, a precedent is a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. To put it simply, it's like a path set by a previous traveler, which future travelers (in this case, judges and lawyers) use to guide their journey through similar legal landscapes.

Precedent vs. Precedence: Clarifying the Confusion

It's easy to confuse 'precedent' with 'precedence,' but they have distinct meanings. 'Precedent' refers to the legal decision that serves as an example or authority for future cases. 'Precedence,' on the other hand, relates to the order of importance or priority. In legal contexts, you'll almost always be dealing with 'precedent.'

The Impact of Setting a Precedent

When a court sets a precedent, it creates a standard that other courts are often expected to follow. This occurs when a higher court, such as an appellate court or a supreme court, makes a ruling on a particular issue. Lower courts are then generally required to adhere to this established rule in future cases that present similar questions. This system ensures consistency and predictability in the law, which is essential for fairness and stability.

The Phrase "Take Precedent"

Occasionally, you might encounter the phrase "take precedent," which can cause some confusion. Typically, this is a misstatement of the term "take precedence," implying that one thing is more important or urgent than another and should be dealt with first. In legal contexts, the correct term is almost always "precedent," not "take precedent."

The Dynamics of Legal Precedents

It's important to note that not all precedents are created equal. Some precedents are considered 'binding,' meaning that they must be followed. Others are 'persuasive,' which allows a court to consider them but does not require the court to follow them. The binding nature of precedent depends on the hierarchy of courts; a lower court must follow the precedents set by courts above it in the legal system. A court does not have to follow its own precedents (though it often does for consistency's sake) and may overrule them if there is a compelling reason to do so.

In conclusion, the concept of precedent is foundational in legal practice, providing a framework for decision-making that promotes a coherent and stable legal system. Its application ensures that similar cases are treated similarly, unless there is a substantial reason to diverge, fostering fairness and order in the administration of justice.

What are some examples of precedent in legal contracts?

Need help making sense of complex legalese?

Detangle your own document →